01
Read the evidence first
Start with the quoted or referenced passages before deciding whether the issue is real.
Guide
What to do with manuscript continuity findings
Review, triage, and act on evidence-backed manuscript continuity findings without losing author control.
Short version
What matters most
A continuity finding is a review prompt, not an order. The author decides whether the flagged detail is a real issue, an intentional choice, or a false positive.
- Do not fix every flag automatically.
- Look for clusters. Several small findings may point to one underlying revision issue.
- Rerun checks after large fixes to catch new contradictions.
Steps
Prepare the manuscript
Use these steps before running a Wise Wombat continuity assessment.
02
Sort by risk
Prioritize high-impact findings that affect plot logic, reader trust, or late-stage revision cost.
03
Choose the smallest honest fix
Sometimes the fix is one sentence. Sometimes the issue points to a deeper scene or structural problem.
04
Mark the decision
Accept, dismiss, or resolve findings so the manuscript review history stays usable.
FAQ
Common questions
Format and workflow decisions are easier when the goal is clear: a readable current manuscript in the intended order.
Can a finding be wrong?
Yes. Wise Wombat is diagnostic software. Authors should review evidence and decide.
Should I rewrite every flagged passage?
No. Some findings need a tiny clarification, some need a larger fix, and some may be intentional.